Sunday, February 21, 2016

In defence of Mr. Chauhan and his ilk

I don't know if you have noticed, between Virat Kohli's breakup and the Amazon super-sale, but there has been a lot of violence of late. Most media persons and experts have screamed out against it, leading to a lowering of volume in TV remotes across the country. The coverage has been extensive- in many news programs, the screens have been hardly big enough to accommodate all the participants and channels have had to morph people whose views are similar- for example, the BJP, VHP and all the nation lovers, the Left and the loonies,  and the Congress and the clueless.
In all the din, there is a disturbing consensus in the liberal media that somehow the brave lawyers who en masse came to take on the might of one Kanhaiya Kumar, are to blame.And if blame has to have a face, it has become V S Chauhan's, a face that has launched a thousand jurists. If you listen to the pundits (not the ones in your neighbourhood temple)- they say that he has instigated this assault. Mr. Chauhan, a man, who at any other time, would have been happy to sell you a lovely used scooter on discount along with his legal services- has been besieged with press men pestering him about politics. Little do they know, for they know little- but Mr. Chauhan and Mr. Sharma  are flagbearers of Mr. Modi's other campaign- "Break in India". Unlike its more famous brethren "Make in India", Break in India works on the principle of using pure nationalistic forces to break the bones of all anti-nationalists. Break in India counters anti-nationalism, anarchy, and the festering problem of student's speeches that is plaguing the nation. Make in India may dream of golden rainbows, of soaring commerce, of riches- but Break in India, tackles head on our major problems, punches through the issues that bedevil us and kicks out the insidious influence of the youth.
Winston S. Churchill, the great nationalist, once said, "If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack". Judging by Mr. Chauhan's actions, he has a very very important point to make. Repeatedly. And to his credit, he does not shirk. When push comes to shove- and he does both, he comes out all punches flying, in his hard hitting avatar of the protector of India's freedom, nationalism and the Indian way of life. The press may give a shellacking to all- but not to Mr. Chauhan or Mr. Sharma or their band. They shall not be shellacked- they shall not be stilled by the anarchy of students and youngsters. They will rise (preferably after 9, if the night before was a little too much), they will march from Karolbag to Paharganj (with a chai-samosa break in between) and will storm the bastion of the lawless- the Delhi High Court.
But whilst the plight of the brave lawyers fills me with sympathy, as a fervent lover of our nation, I have to raise a few questions. The first one is whether in their zeal to teach the barbarous bacchas of JNU, they have missed an important constituency in the young generation that creates more anarchy than anyone else. I refer to the kindergarteners and the pre-schoolers. Ask any teacher in any school, and they will tell you, that the most unruly, the largest slogan shouting hordes are in Upper KG and downwards. Little Ritwick does not merely scream for milk, he screams for Azaadi all the time, even if it is to go to the loo. I knew a girl named Hansika, who would boo at all things (and I presume, that would include the nation) and another girl named Ruchi who'd vomit everyday- on other people's shirts, on the table cloths, the duster and I am assuming, on the national fabric, if she had been brought close to it. The lawyers can still redress this omission from their spate of super-nationalism but it would need swift action. Summer vacations are coming and soon there will be no children in the schools and it will be logistically very difficult for lawyers to go to every house and try to beat up the child. There may be an accompanying problem, that if they do not go in sufficient numbers, they may get beaten up by the stridently anti-nationalistic parents.
Another way in which they can proceed, now that they are marching towards pure nationalistic nirvana, is to consider their targets carefully. They have been battling terrorists in JNU and New Delhi and amongst the press and the people- but that supply may dwindle. You may find that the student that you were beating to pulp was not a terrorist but an undergraduate of Political Science, who if you had waited for a few years, would anyway have been beaten up by society, and would have wandered around jobless till he'd decide to hang himself under the statue of Che Guevera. And dear lawyers, while I admire your zeal- you need to conserve your strength. Punching the press is purposeless. You beat one and the next thing you know is an entire bunch has come to film that beating.
So I tell you, consider, my dear countrymen, consider. The next logical step to fighting terrorism is to take that short trip to the glaciers of Siachen and the valleys of PoK and call on the Lakshar e Toiba. Trust me, you will not have to worry about who the terrorists are- all of them will be. You can fight them to your heart's content. You can demonstrate the true blue nationalistic spirit that courses your veins (and indeed, if you find yourself unable to do so, they will soon oblige). So I say to you- go forward, my friends, go and show them the strength of Bharat Mata. As a fellow nationalist myself, I shall clap you on from my couch in Bangalore and wait to be inspired!

Monday, May 27, 2013

Six things men do better than women

The lot of the Indian man who aspires to gentlemanly conduct is a trying one. To begin, he is hindered by his name. Mr. Muralikrishnan M Vayavelu lacks the brio of Monsieur D’ Argatnan or Don Juan. We might share garlic recipes, but not the charm- and if truth be told, Mr. Muralikrishnan is better left to work his finesse on resource scheduling sheets than sheets of the other kind.

But this blog is not about Mr. Muralikrishnan and his glorious IIT-ian heritage. This blog is to protest- against the calumny of capricious circulars, the perfidy of pernicious periodicals, the duplicity of deleterious dailies.

I refer, of course, to the article in Cosmopolitan- 12 things that women do better than men.

It has been a truth, now universally accepted, that on a broad, generic level women are better than men. They are nicer, more efficient, better looking and socially more connected. But no, that is not enough for Cosmopolitan. It needs to lay out in fussy detail exactly what measures men fall short on.

It says that there are 12 reasons. It avoids the cosy familiarity of 10 and the vagueness of 15. It says, with a precision of laser scalpel created by a Kaizen master in a German robotic facility, that yes, women are superior and here are the 12 reasons supporting their supremacy.

To this, I say no- a defiant, undaunted – No!
Not till I am standing. Not till I am on my two feet. Not till-though I have been up for nearly 15 minutes and the urge to slump on couch is great.  I raise this blog as a revolt against this utter fibbery.

And I state - Men are better than women in 6 different ways. Take that, Cosmopolitan! –(and may you nurse your wounds with 20 different cocktails to perk up your party ).

In case, I have your attention- here are the 6 ways we can prove the excellence of the male genus.

1.       Shopping: It may sound counter-intuitive (the word brings back happy memories of my college days when my logic professor would say “Sandeep’s got an answer right. Now that’s counter-intuitive hypothesis” but he would say that with such a big smile that I forgave him for all the times he said it.)
The other day, I went shopping for vegetables. It was the middle of a cricket match, but I went, nevertheless. I had just returned and was watching the critical overs between tea and drinks- when my wife bustled in- without preamble, I tell you- and demanded, “How much tomato did you buy?”
You, intelligent readers, will at once spot the sheer idiocy of the question. There was the sales slip in the bag- all she’d need to do was to look at it- but no, I needed to tell her how much tomato I had bought.
I reached out for the bill and said coolly, “About 2 kgs, dear- why do you ask?”
“We already have ½ a kg and I wanted ½ a kg more”, she screamed, “and you have bought 2 kgs.”
I looked again at the buying list that she had prepared and realized the misunderstanding. It was simple, really. She had asked for 2 kgs. of potato and ½ kg of tomato, and I had missed the potato and bought 2 kgs of tomato instead.  I pointed it out to her- it seemed like an everyday mix-up, something we could ignore with a light laugh and a smile.

“We can eat a lot of salads this month”, I suggested.

But she would not be mollified.

And then we noticed the bag of tomato. The bottom part of the bag had sagged, something akin to the jowls of my hung-over uncle, the younger one- (long story, maybe later) - but only redder. There was no doubt- between the time that I had bought the tomato and now- most of it had turned to mush.

We could rescue about ½ kg of tomato. I pointed out the happy coincidence to my wife.

“Well, you wanted ½ a kg- and that’s what you got”.

Her stare made me decide that it would be better if I went for a walk and let things cool down a bit.
When I came back, I noticed that there was a cow, a goat and a cat scouring the waste bin near our house. The cow looked up from its rumination and I noticed, by its distinct bloody red snout- that it had evidently been grazing on the mushy tomatoes.

I said to myself, “A woman feeds her family. But a man feeds the world.”

2.       Having a world view: It is indisputable. Men have a better world view. Let me tell you a brief story of my friend.
He was sitting at his dining table a few years back and he said, “Russia is going down.”
His wife, an Eva Braun of her generation- capable of being loved only by Hitler and no one else- laughed- a pealy, whiny laugh that hassled him not a little, but he kept his calm. “You are a pretty stupid buffoon”, she said. Rather unkindly, I’d add- as he could have been called stupid- but would have never answered to either of the other two descriptions.
Now, what happened next was, that, one day, as she went for her morning prowl around the park- she was hit by a truck and died.
My friend bore her death with fortitude and never allowed a hint of grief to intrude upon his wan smile.
It was later found out that the truck had veered off course and hit the woman because the axle was faulty. They had asked for spare parts- but this was a Russian truck and the factory that made those axles, was having a strike-and hence, they could not change the axles.
It proved my friend’s point, of course- about the interconnectedness of things and the advantage of having a world view.
My friend has remained a bachelor throughout- and now the heads the Communist wing of his community.

3.       Sports: It is a cliché- a man’s love for sports and a woman’s steadfast refusal to understand it. But my point goes deeper than that.
It was the summer of 1987. This was the Cricket World Cup that we deserved to win. Gavaskar hit a century against the New Zealanders- textbook batting- but a totally different textbook than what he had been reading all his life. It was, as if, a bunch of bhajan singing aunts had turned into a band of tap dancing cockatoos, but only more improbable.
But the world cup had not started well for us. We had lost to Australia in our first match.
It was then that my friend Pranesh discovered his yellow lockerboy underwear. It was the one that he had on, the day India won against Pakistan (B & H Cup’85) and in Sharjah- 1986. He wore that straight through for all the matches in the world cup and we were winning again.
Point to note- it had been years since he had bought the undergarment and he had not stinted on his daily bread-or daily meat- in the meantime- and therefore, these briefs were tight. Plus, they did look like they had once been the picnic ground for a family of recently deceased rats (who’d have died of old age)- and smelt the kind of odour that you get when you are wandering around a basement searching for a lost ball and end up picking up a disease that not only kills you but also wipes out the whole city in days- and stars Dustin Hoffman in the remake version.
His girlfriends- regrettably- he had none- so I use the term loosely to refer to the women who’d deign to come close enough to talk to him- began to prefer the benefits of long distance communication through telephone and letter post. In the common room, we, as sympathetic friends, began to give him ample space to sit and enjoy the cricket in peace- in recognition of his selfless sacrifice (the tightness of the briefs did threaten a permanent impotency).
Coming back to the game, Gavaskar was on 45 when Pranesh felt the urgent need of the “runs”. It had started slowly but had now intensified into an uncontrollable urge to poop. However, the toilets were at least 100 metres away and there was no way that Pranesh would be able to see the match while sitting on the pot. Like all men, Pranesh had grasped instinctively that if he left his seat, even for one instance, Gavaskar would lose his wicket. Gavaskar’s only century in one-day internationals, that too, in a world cup- therefore- depended if not entirely, but to a large extent, on Pranesh clenching his bottom and suffering his, regrettably, not so silent torment.
It was tragic. Chatfield would bowl, Gavaskar would wind up and hit a four- and Pranesh would be there, suffering a torment, both physical and psychological. For remember, he knew that  not only was he running the risk of a fusillade of feculence in his underpants at any moment, he was also acutely aware that such an action would invariably lead him to be branded “Pranesh the pooper” or “Potty Pranesh” or any number of such coarse names.

But it was Gavaskar’s century- he had no choice.   

The inevitable happened. Bracewell bowled- a slightly overpitched delivery, marginally, I may say. On any other day, Gavaskar would have on driven it for a respectable single. But this was another day- after all, Chetan Sharma had taken a hat-trick, to the universal surprise of all. In a trice, the left leg went forward, almost to the pitch of the ball but not completely, the hands came down in a powerful arc and the ball sailed over the boundary lines, high into the stand. Bracewell had not even completed his follow through. The stadium erupted in a roar.

Unfortunately, there was a roar at the other end too- and we turned around to see Pranesh clutching his pants and running towards the bathroom, at a fairly respectable pace, given the enormous bulge in his bottoms.

The aftermath of the tragedy was short and brutal. The underpants were found to be irrecoverable.  So were his pants, which had been badly affected by the violence of the eruption. We decided that the only honourable end was to burn them- and we did that and mourned their passing that evening before dinner. No one was sadder than Pranesh the potty pants (this was the sobriquet that finally stuck with him) but we felt that his underpants and pants had done their bit.

The Indian team however failed to keep their end of the bargain. In the next game, Gavaskar was out, bowled by Philip Defreitas for 4 and though Azhar and Kapil Dev flayed around for a bit, the match was lost and so was the world cup.

Tell me, one instance of such selflessness in the cause of sports from the female gender and I will take back my assertion that a man may develop a liking for his wife, some sentimental attachment with his car, maybe a tolerance for his children, but it is only with sports that you will see- pure, unadulterated love.

4.       Cooking: This is not something I lightly asseverate. Women, may be doing it everyday. It is even possible that the man’s role so far has been curtailed to boiling eggs, not spilling the coffee and changing the gas cylinder.
But I stand by my assertion- men are still better.
Let me explain. If you have been following the stories of Sherlock Holmes, you would know that the acme of detectives- the Lestrades, the Gregsons- was Holmes himself- the “consulting detective”.
In the BBC series- Sherlock- you find in the tense moments, beside the pool, where Watson and Holmes are in immediate peril of being shot to pieces, the villain is Moriarty- the “consulting criminal”- again, the capstone of the criminal world.
A few days back, I was invited to a friend’s place in Kolkata. My friend is a Bengali and I went prepared for a delicious 5 course arterio-sclerotic dinner. The food was wonderful, course upon course of the tastiest dishes imaginable- but the standout was the mutton curry that his wife was preparing when we reached their house.
It was a sight. Remember it was summer at Kolkata, 43 degrees if not more. The fire on the stove burned bright and my friend’s wife, normally a vision of calm allure, was bent over the pressure cooker, frantically stirring the frying pieces of mutton with a ladle that almost came up to her arms.
My friend, who had evidently bathed and smelt of fresh talcum powder and perfume- and was wearing a white cotton panjabi-kurta, of a nawabian finery and delicacy, paused at the gate of air conditioned drawing room- where he had been ensconced for some time.
The kitchen door was some distance away. He paused and smelt the air.
“You need to put some more cinnamon,” he said.
Believe me, when I tell you- that I would not be able to tell something like this from that distance. There was the smell of mutton frying, the smell of garam masala blending into the lovely fragrance of curry. But to identify one element out of all that- that was genius.
My friend withdrew into the cool confines of his room. But I stood outside while I considered him. He stood alone (actually he was reclining on the settee, but you get my drift).
Here was the acme of the world of cuisine- the master of brewing, broiling, browning, frying, grilling, heating, roasting, simmering, sizzling, steaming, steeping, stewing, toasting- the pinnacle of the profession-the “consultant cook”.

5.       House Work: I can hear dozens of female voices in angry demurral. Actually, I can hear my wife trying to teach multiplication tables to my son for the past half hour, which sounds pretty similar.
But it is the truth. We are better at housework, at least, in the things that matter.
Years ago, when I was a young lad and my friend, who was also a young lad himself, went to a party and came back after a night out with a few friends, having had a few convivial drinks. It was a cold freezing Delhi winter and between this and that, and the drinks- we had plain forgotten to eat.
It was 2 am.
The wind, mistaking us for people in an Alistair Maclean thriller set in icy Arctic, was as sharp as a carving knife through a soufflé- and the chill bit us with a vehemence that would make a Doberman Pinscher look like a blasé nibbler.
And we were hungry.
We were hungry as starving Russian peasants who are forever looking at the possibilities of making grandma dinner- and we struggled along the streets of Delhi in vain for food, any food- even a small little cart of fried rubbish that would surely make us sick the next day- but would give us enough to survive the night. But it was in vain.
It was nearly an hour and half when we gave up our bootless quest and decided to return to the hostel.
We had just shuffled into our rooms and collapsed on our beds when my friend jumped up with a startled cry.
“There is an animal on my bed- something horrible, soft, and squishy and terrible”, he screamed as he grabbed at the light switch.
This made me jump up too and for some moments we were both tottering around the room till we saw what it was that had made my friend jump in the first place.
It was the remnant of a Subway sandwich.
It came back to me. Three days back, one of our more munificent colleagues had bought us a sandwich and here was the half eaten remnant of it- placed by providence to save us from starvation.
We fell on it like wolves on a prime-time National Geographic show and soon every crumb of bread on the torn Subway cover was gone. The half sandwich had provided some succour- but not enough. We were busy trying to chew on the scraps of paper for any odd-ends of the sandwich when we were both imbued with the happy thought that there could be sustenance in other rooms too.
And so we went, rather like adventurers of yore, on a mission to find food. And even though we encountered minor imprecations- and some sleepy bodies too heavy to move, this did not deter us-for we unearthed a rich harvest of about 6 packs (half eaten) of crisps, one apple that had been barely nibbled upon, a couple of biscuits with just a smidgen of fungi on it (we decided that if we could have mushrooms, why not this?- which made excellent logic on that day) and another half-eaten sandwich that was at least a day fresher than the one we had before.
I tell you, it was the saving of us.
On that cold, freezing Delhi winter we sat down and thanked the considerate nature of all those who had not, in the name of housework, thrown out these essential items of nutrition and had saved them for such a day.
I ask you, dear reader, to give me one instance where a woman’s so called housework has saved lives. For we cannot be measured on the just the sum total of our achievements- it is on the difference that we make to the lives of others that ultimately decides our final eminence. And in this, we men do make a mark, as my next point will prove.

Finally, the 6th thing that men do better-

6.       Environmental Sensitivity: There was once a time when a colleague of mine- a man, of course, wandered into a lecture on sustenance and environmental sensitivity. He had meandered into the room because they had a pot of coffee on the table and some of that stuff that comes on toothpicks and features lettuce and bits of meat- for he adored those things- but he sat down and listened to the talk on what was being done to the environment.
He was aghast. He had always been a peace loving fellow and had not realized that he had been, inadvertently, slaying Mother Nature. It used to pain him to kill mosquitoes, so you can imagine that he was mortified by his flagrant actions that had led to the depredation of the natural world. It opened his eyes- he would, nay- he must reform. And as a sign of his desire for such amelioration, he would don green. It would be a symbol of his resolve to do his best for the macrocosm.
Like all men, he believed in instant activity and so he went out and bought the greenest pajamas that money could buy- or what was available at the going rate in Chowringee footpath.
He woke up the next morning with the firmness of doing something for the environment- and hence he did not notice that the speech he had heard the day before had already wrought vital changes in him.
It was when he looked down at his hands and feet during breakfast that he noticed the strange transformation that was going on.
He was slowly turning green.
It came to him in bits- at first, it was his fingers- and then his toes, and finally his arms and legs that took on a distinct verdant hue.
A few days later he noticed green splotches around his body, some on the stomach, a few on the cheeks, bits of it under his chin.
Another day, as he got up from his bed where he had sat butt-naked (don’t ask me why) he noticed green impressions on his bed and realized, upon closer inspection in the hallway mirror that his bums had grown green too.
It was as if environmental sensitivity had seeped into his soul and was driving him to a beryl tinge!
He mentioned this to his girlfriend, who- with the typically insensitivity of her gender- scoffed at his idea and made some disparaging comments about cheap clothes losing colour- which was completely beside the point.
For a few days, he became a local celebrity. He would don his green pajamas, which he now dubbed as his environmental uniform and would demonstrate to all who were interested, the steady greening of a man who is aware of his sustainability and environmental responsibilities. And truly, it was a remarkable metamorphosis. Like King Midas who changed everything he touched into gold- everything this man touched turned green.
His white shirts, after the first soaking, turned into a rich green. Soon it was the turn of the socks, then the trousers and the various undergarments. They all had a distinct viridian chroma- it was as if his entire wardrobe was transforming along with him.
It was not long after that disaster struck. One day whilst ironing his environmental uniforms, he got distracted by Sachin Tendulkar’s batting on TV and he burnt his pajamas.
The damage was irreparable. With much trepidation, he got rid of the dresses, but he knew in his heart, that without his trusty dress, his super green powers would go.
It would be nice to say that nothing of that sort happened, but the truth is that sans them he steadily lost his superpowers and it was not long before he was back to the sort of dull grey pallour, that was his complexion.
His encounter with the world of the chartreuse was fleeting but it was wonderful while it lasted. It was this sentiment that he was expressing to his girlfriend, one fine evening, for probably the twentieth time- when she turned to him savagely and said, “Oh, those green pajamas must have been shedding colour” and stormed away.
My friend was nonplussed. He had not expected such a reaction. He was, however, a wise man and understood that his girlfriend, however accommodating- was still of the female gender and they have been notorious in not understanding anything about the environment. He forgave her and  became a nicer, sweeter human being.
The cause of the natural world did not leave him and he eventually became the head of sustainability and environmental safety of a large corporation. He even has his private jet that he uses in his frequent soirees across the world.

His brief period of blazing aquamarine remains a mystery to this day. A man turning green due to environment sensitivity- match that, women of the world!

I conclude- those who have had the patience to go through these points would undoubtedly agree with me that there are some things in which we men, stand alone.

Women, I have noticed, generally stand a few feet away.


Saturday, October 23, 2010

What is your child thinking

A simple test to differentiate married and unmarried couples:when you see the title of this post, if you are unmarried and you are dating the sweet someone, you'll blurt out-"Let me first figure out what my girlfriend is thinking?"

(Sometimes it is better not to know)



It is a fact of scientific definitude that marriage metamorphoses your girl friend, who as you know is a national/ international woman of mystery (depending on where you met her) to a paragon of predictability. The drum rolls of happiness that you heard when she espied you give way to eye rolls of exasperation. Sigmund Freud who often pondered "what does a woman want" spent most times working and remembering his mother- and very little time around his wife (Which was all very good, else he would have pondered, like most married men do,"What does a woman not want?")


(I want my Mommy)

If you pause and think- it is quite simple- after the woman has done the bulk of the hard work and brought the bundle of joy into this earth, all she wants is some peace and quiet. A cup of tea/coffee, some serials/books to while the time, a clean enough house, intermittent moments with the baby- and a tray of non-fattening chocolate pastries.

Instead, she has a wailing, screaming gargyole, the house looking like the remnants of Indo-Pak joint beautification drive and food cold enough to single handedly solve the global warming issue.

At this point, while you slink out of the room as fast as you can, since you know that the baby has soiled its diaper again (actually, to be fair to you- you don't. No father knows what's the matter with the baby, except that it is something foul and revolting and can only be viewed from a safe distance)- well, as you slink out of the room, all that the woman- who is the pearl of your eye, your noor-e-jahan, your precious heart-throb is thinking is-"Wait till I get this baby to sleep- then I will cut him apart, piece by piece, with the meat cleaver".


(Time for a strategic withdrawal from the scene)

Now I know what you are going to say: "One moment, Sandeep- 

1. I do not slink out of the room- more of a brisk walk or a very manly canter
2. I don't have a meat cleaver in the house, rah rah rah
3. Was that awesome dish that they used to make at Samrat Dhaba called Chicken Noor-e-jahan or Chicken Mumtaz"

The quick answers to that are of course,

1. You can't call that a canter- more of a meander, really. Sorry but you are not as fleet of foot as you once were.
2. Anything sharp will do- and if your wife is in a particular malevolent mood, she'll actually prefer skinning you with something blunt.
3. Neither- it was Chicken Khatun-e-Zannat, in honour of the first queen of Turkey who loved Labradors. It actually tasted awesome because we were too drunk to differentiate between chicken and bits of charcoal.

So, back to the main topic- what is your child thinking?

There is a short answer and a long one depending on whether your child is a girl or a boy. I don't want to sound sexist, but if you are a parent of a boy, now is pretty much a time for you to stop reading.

Stop. Pause. Consider.

Do you really want to know the terrible truth? Would you rather not spend the rest of your life in blissful ignorance of how bad it's going to be? Wouldn't it be better to go through life like the woman in the Ramsay horror movies, wearing an oversized  towel and walking into the dark, dingy hovel to explore the reason behind the scary noises she heard when she was taking a shower (while she got drenched in either the remains of a Holi jamboree or tikka masala gravy).

(I said, dye, you morons, not die)

Yes. You do? Fair enough, not that I didn't warn you.

To get rid of the parents of the girl child- and even though this blog is democratic and suffused with the spirit of bonhomie- one draws the line at the comfortable, happy parents of girls. They are simply insufferable and deserve all the pitfalls fate can give them, just to make up for the huge advantage of having been blessed with a baby girl.

So I say, let's get rid of them from this blog, so that we can have serious men and women about, people who have seen and are seeing suffering up close- in short- parents of boys.

Since the topic is what's your child is thinking and some of the children are sure to be girls (not if Haryana had its way!!!)- let's first understand what the daughter is thinking.

1. She wants to be good. And pretty. And to be loved by all. And to be the beau ideal of best behaviour.
2. She wants to take care of her family. It starts with her Barbie doll, followed by her father and then her mother. As she grows older, the parents take a step upwards in the order of priority.

Priorities:
Age: 0-1: Milk, Toy, Mommy, Daddy
Age 1+-6: Barbie Doll, Daddy, Mummy
Age 6+-12: Daddy, Barbie Doll, Cute Boyfriend, BFF Girlfriend, Mummy
Age 13-17: Daddy, BFF Girlfriend,Cute Boyfriend, Hrithik Roshan, Salman Khan, the World, Global civilization, Some Mass Murderers, Dictators, maybe Mummy
Age 17-25: Daddy, Cute Boyfriends...................................................................................Mummy

Age 25 & above: Daddy, Mummy, Husband, BFF Girlfriends

3. If you are her father, congratulations. Good for you- you made it. You are going to be someone's hero, all your life. Her husband, if he does combine the strength of Superman, the charm of Casanova and the brains of Homi Bhaba, will come a poor second. If not, then the comparison between him and you is too ridiculous to contemplate.

Which leaves us to the key question: What is your son thinking?

To all the parents who have huddled over the remains of crashed and mangled cycles, broken electronic items and costly china, large sticky spills and a smörgåsbord of talcum powder, cosmetics, three day old rice and sand mixture and an assortment of stuff - all on the floor and wondered, "What was he thinking?"- worry not, heave a sigh of relief- for the answer is at hand.

To answer this question, we must at first combine various sciences- Physics, Psychology and Communications  & Chemistry- for a complete understanding of how your son's mind works.

Physics: The Concept of Space-Time:
It is a fundamental fact that your concept of space is completely different from your child's.

Space:
For example, when you come back and recline on the sofa, while switching on the TV to watch re-runs of India vs. Sri Lanka (It is actually a new game you are watching, but these are so frequent these days- like diet resolutions after the Puja holidays- that you wouldn't know the difference)- you are on the sofa, watching telly and probably sneaking out the box of sohan papdis that your wife had tried to hide in a dark corner of the refrigerator.

Look around you. What do you see?

Dad: "2 side sofas, 1 table, 1 TV stand and TV, the sexy nude that I bought in the name of art hanging on the wall, my bag of crisps"

Mom: "Dirt on the carpet, side sofas with the covers askew- they need to be washed NOW!!! Those food stains- GOD !!!!! Isn't it clear enough to any mean intelligence- oh oh oh, is that sauce???
The centre table where everything is spread out, is this a drawing room or a dissection chamber- mess, mess, mess everywhere- GOD!!!
Why can't the books be stacked at one side-does it really need me to come every day, all the time and adjust things, and keep papers together- oh my GOD, is that a dal stain at the edge of the table- how do these people live???
The TV seems to have a year's layer of dust on it- I am sacking that maid tomorrow- and oh, oh ,oh- crisps on the table, crisps on the floor- crisps everywhere on the sofa- oh my GOD, it is an invasion of crisps (as an aside, given the no. of times she invokes GOD it is no wonder that women are more religious than men) etc. etc. etc.

The Child: The child does not see the living room scene in any of the above two ways.

He sees the living room as an extended obstacle course.

When he sees the living room, he thinks: "Ok, here's how it will go.

I'll try for warp acceleration on my sturdy superbike and bounce off the edge of the table to generate the necessary spin to orient my craft upwards.
The tricky bit is going to be side sofa but if I can climb it by releasing supersonic velocity through air power (or what you adults call screaming), I can run up the wall and bounce off the main sofa and swerve mid air to the TV-
if I can do this well enough, I can crash into the heart of the TV, thereby finally destroying the beast that lurks behind the dark LCD screen".


(No wonder boys are good at Physics)


Time: 
Any parent of a boy would know that there a three major playtimes for his toddler- the 9 am to 12:30 pm shift (morning playtime, where the major activity comprises of running with his eyes closed- normally happens in the playschool), the 3 pm-10 pm ( divided into 3 different activities: "House Annihilation": 3 pm-5pm, "Playground Rampage": 5 pm-7 pm and "War at Home": 7 pm- 10 pm) and of course, the 3 am to 4:30 am slot.

Unlike the US Presidential elections where the 3 am call was just a poll ploy, here you will have to be ready for it- it starts with gradual stirring at 2:45 am, culminating into a full fledged wakefulness at 3.
At this point, your child will be thinking- do I dance on my parents to wake them up or just do a cheery tring tring while I wheel my cycle around the bed? In most cases, he shows a broadminded approach to the issue and compromises by doing both. Any move on your part to get out of bed to make him come back to sleep is seen as a beginning of an hour long peekaboo game of "Get to the Bed and Run out of it OVER AND OVER AGAIN".


(or I can use my pram, I am not choosy)

Under such circumstances, the question any parent need to ask himself/herself is: Are you ready for the 3 am call?

Hillary Clinton may be- but she won't be coming to your bedroom at 3 am anytime soon. Not if your child is a boy.

Psychology and Social Communications:
Most boys are experts on all things neurological and can get on anyone's nerves in minutes. In fact, it is an erroneous assumption that the girl/woman is an expert on social networks and communications. Far from it- in fact, primary research amongst all the members of the social network of the boy child suggests an unusual strong bond in that network, based on the universal agreement of the pestilence value of the child.

Boys trigger social communications like no other. The act of herding the boy into the school bus, then goading  him into the school, rallying him in the playground, and finally dragging him from the playground to his house involves deep cooperation of various entities. Controlling the Brownian motion of a boy's movement in a room filled with breakable items is  a group enterprise rivalling the level of cooperation as seen in the last days before the opening of the Delhi Commonwealth Games.

We could do the research and prove it- but any parent of a boy would know- every moment of his day (when he is not asleep, of course- the angelic look that most boys have when they are asleep has led to so many parents ignoring the beast within and realizing it too late when the boy spends the evening trying to somersault onto the dining table)- anyway, every moment of the day when the boy child is awake strongly necessitates close cooperation of at least 4 individuals (all in their prime of health and fitness) to avoid any major mishaps from happening.

Girls- bah- they can be supervised by one person- in fact, not even that, in most cases.

Chemistry:
All boys are chemists at heart. From the time your one year old upset his bottle of milk in his urine (which he had deposited on the floor in the spirit of scientific enquiry) to your toddler who gleefully wades into the pool of stagnant rain water- it is their deep abiding love for all things chemical- and the proclivity of starting something combustible- that is at play.
Show me a boy who hasn't succeeded at, or, at least tried, burning his eyebrows and I will show you a liar or a sex change operatee- if that's the word I am searching.

So while you potter around in your house, your child has noticed 5 different things:

1. The bottle of water on the dining table
2. Massage oil that you kept at the bedside and forgot to keep it out of his range
3. The bottle of cleaning liquid under the sink
4. Talcum powder on the dressing table
5. The ink bottle (his holy grail, really) that you have inadvertently left nearer the edge of the study table, which can be induced to fall off by pulling at the table cover

If you really want to know what he is thinking right now, i.e. in the elegant words of maths,

d/dx (this blog)= "What would happen if I mix all this right now and smear it all over the wall"

With this, I must end this blog.I have tried to tell you what your child is thinking. I have also added, as a bonus, your thoughts and the thoughts of parents like you.(Even the thoughts of the girl child, though strictly speaking, that's not worth a blog). 

I'll leave you now, I know you have work to do.

Btw, that doesn't come off. It is better to re-paint the wall.




Saturday, January 9, 2010

Parenthood

The blog starts as a warning to all those who have considered blogging for the first time. 
Don't.
Long ago, when my sister wrote her blogs on International Terrorism, I was one of the first to tell her all about grammar, syntax and the importance of short sentences.
I had never considered "no sentence" as a problem.
It is now, especially at the start of a blog. You stare at the html screen and search for the phrase that would reveal to the world your wit and erudition- and instead the words "Gooli the Bully" loops on in your head.
Getting to the point, and your money's worth (assuming that Internet time = money), the topic that I can write on with some expertise is Domestic Terrorism.


Anyone who has a child (preferably a son- daughters, and I am being sexist here, but so is the way of the world- daughters, bless them, are generally sweet and wonderful- and if they can smear their faces with mashed bananas and chocolate and wear a Donald Duck dress- then all's well in their world). 
But anyone with a son below 3 years would wonder about why Sherlock Holmes kept going on about Moriarty and what's the brouhaha about  Blofeld.


In 2005, HCL ran these ads to show that it was a young, vibrant company- some of these were like this.
Very true- I don't mean HCL's claims- they may be as true or false depending on what you believe- but the fact is that young kids are fearless.
What they don't add to this is- not only are they fearless, they crave danger- they actively court it with the determination of a telecaller on his month-end target interrupting your dinner . 

Try a simple test- in a room keep a box of toys, a cot with soft cushions and smiling teddy bears, and a switch that has been connected to enough charge to blow up the rest of your house(check out any of the Tom & Jerry cartoons or the Looney Tunes stuff for instructions).
Then introduce a child to that room and watch where he runs.
                                                                                                    
     


(Source:  Looney Tunes)


On second thoughts, don't. The knowledge of your child's proclivities does not compensate for homelessness.
So we know, while you are reading the blog, your child is fearlessly trying to destroy your house. Under such circumstances, the question that you will naturally ask me as a responsible parent is "Do you think they'll make Blue-II with Lara Dutta and Katrina Kaif?"
No seriously- you'd be asking "As parents with a mortgage and a debt trap of former Czechoslovakia, what can we do to counter this menace without having to go to jail or having to pacify our kid for the next 3 hours?"


Here are 5 things that you must remember.


1. Use your experience: Unless you are a teenage parent or an episode of Balika Vadhu gone wrong, life has given you enough experience to counter the machinations of your progeny. They may have the speed, but you have the experience, the anticipation.
Remember you have superior skills.

For example, my stint as an opening batsman in my school days has helped me immensely while handling my son. Just as you follow the course of the bouncer from the hands of the bowler to the point where it passes harmlessly in front of your nose- similarly concentrate on your toddler's hands, especially when you are feeding him mashed peas.
The hands will flail outwards to build the necessary momentum and then zoom in, depending on whether the child is right or left handed, from one side to land on your face. This is when you need to bend your knees, sway the head and duck. Use the momentum to push him outwards as you return to your normal stance. Look out for the other hand since toddlers are notoriously ambidextrous. 


(Source: Cricinfo)


That's all there is to it. You will need a bit of practice however- the footwork's tricky at times. I suggest a few rounds of this when your wife is handling the child would do.


2. Conquer your ego, Don't be afraid to ask for help: This may sound Zen Buddhist like, but as Lord Rayden mouths this super philosophical line to Sonya Blade in Mortal Kombat



(Source: Google Images from God knows where)


Like all military generals and successful corporate combatants, it is crucial to know when to ask for help.
Picture this scene. Your apple of the eye/jigar ka tukda etc. etc. walks into the room, casually tearing his diaper straps. In any minute the room will be a smorgasbord of potty, pee and resultant tears. As a concerned parent, do you
1. Run out of the room screaming
2. Deal with it. Have done this a million times before.
3. Pretend to be working and immediately minimize the screen shots of Angelina Jolie that you were surreptitiously looking at in your laptop.
4. Ask your wife calmly for help. Carry the baby to the wife, if necessary. Slink out of the room till all the mess has been disposed of.
Now unless you are a mother of 1-2 kids, option 2 is out of the question. And let's face it, while option 1 is the easiest to execute, it makes you look like a terrible wussy and will always be a chink in any argument with your wife. 3 is unworkable- the first thing that your son will do is to run to your laptop after he has finished doodling with his doody.
The 4th choice is the only workable option- it leaves you looking mildly in charge- and if you can imbue enough dignity to the proceedings and can do it fast enough to avoid your wife suggesting "Why don't you do this yourself, for a change?" - it would give you a fuzzy man-of-the-house feel and you can use the escape time to continue watching Angelina Jolie.
So, remember- be a man. Ask for help.


3. Use Technology: Modern man has a big advantage over his Pleiolithic counterparts- 50% Discount Sale.
No- actually- it's Technology. It is ubiquitous. It is all pervasive, all encompassing. It is all consuming too, esp. of your bank balance.
Technology gives us the tools to counter the threat of the toddler-dom. I suggest the creation of a state of art network (voice, video and data) for those times when your wife, in a fit of dudgeon, goes shopping- leaving you with the nipper. 10 mins after she leaves- he will either

a. Poop on the floor and wail
b. Run and bang himself against the wall- and wail
c. Poop on the floor and run and bang himself against the wall- and wail
An investment into external noise cancellation headsets would be advisable in the circumstances.
You will need to give your son one of the phones (nothing else distracts your little angel from the job of destroying your house- than the opportunity to dismantle a phone). You can use the other one to call your mother. Tell her how much you love her. Tell her of the countless wonderful days that you spent with her, how even now there is nothing to compare with the food that she makes, and how young she looks (if you can get her on webcam).
Then plead with her to come here. Pronto.
(If you have the webcam, shed a few well chosen tears. Should work like a charm).


4. Prepare, Prepare: The damages from the Tsunami, Hurricane Katrina and floods in Bihar- are prime examples of the government not being prepared for disasters.
Any husband will tell you- preparation is the key to a full head of hair and a reasonably happy wife. Before you proceed with your reading, there is one truth that you must accept. It is self evident when you realize it, but like all simple truths, complex to comprehend at first.
"Your son is an anarchist".
Once you accept this- all other steps will fall in place.
To illustrate- imagine a party where they have set the table for dinner. See the picture below. This is how you see it.





(Source: Somewhere in the Internet)


This is how your child sees the same scene.





What do you do when you face such a scenario in your house, in the restaurant, in the hotel room, in a neighbour's place, at your boss's house etc. etc.
Preparation is key. Put yourself into your son's messy socks and soft woolen shoes and see the world anew.
(If you are having difficulties imagining, see the same scene as a jehadist terrorist who has stumbled upon Uncle Sam's drawing room. List down what you will do).
Got it. Good!
(Before you act to avoid any of this from happening, we must warn you that tying your child in chains is illegal and can lead to imprisonment).
In your house, it is important to tie everything that can be tied down. The rest can be coated with thick woolen covering ( when you want to save your house, a sweater or two is a small sacrifice). Move the movable stuff out of reach. Cover the rest as much as possible.
And remember, there is always duct tape.


5. Let it go: Beyond a point, realize that when you gain the affections of a cute looking junior - these affections come at a price.
It starts with your cell phone. Destruction of your cell phone inevitably spurs your little tyke to greater and bigger things. Like the microwave, the laptop, the DVD player, all the remote controls.
One day after that he decides that he needs to take down a bigger prey. The TV.
The best advice for a father at that stage is to accept the inevitable-embrace the stage of Vanaprastha and realize your inner saint.
Remove your attachment to any worldly possessions- especially anything sleek from Apple. Toddlers love sleek- it invigorates them into a stomping frenzy.
Let it go.
After all, you'll be doing the same to your money the moment your son reaches college.
Let it go. Think that it was never yours (Even if you paid 18,000 Rs. for that Ipod Touch 16 GB 3G).
Let it go.


That's it friends. My 5 points to a better you- a better human being and a better parent.


As they say, Parenthood is almost always Parent of the Hood.